David Allen’s presentation on How the British Mapped the
David used several old maps to demonstrate techniques he is using to compare and analyze maps. He uses Adobe Photoshop to simplify coloring (e.g., reduce to black and white, or blue and white) and then to overlay maps for easy comparison. Applying this technique enabled him to show several versions of the way the Hudson and Mohawk rivers were mapped over time, the influences prior maps had on later maps, etc.
Another analysis tool David uses is Map Analyst, which is a free program (available online: http://mapanalyst.cartography.ch). Map Analyst allows you to compare old maps to modern maps. With it you can match locations on modern maps with the old maps and create displacement vectors and circles of uncertainty. With maps analyzed using Map Analyst and marked with circles of uncertainty, David illustrated the increasing degree of accuracy on maps of the
David’s presentation, particularly the use of new technology tools to analyze old maps, was a great finish to a day filled with technical information. The challenges David faces in finding the information about who made which maps, based on what previous maps, using which method and why actually drives home the importance of issues we discussed earlier in the day such as collecting and preserving, creating metadata, and managing digital rights and access!
2 comments:
David Y. Allen: SUNY Stony Brook, Professor Emeritus
• Side note: Coordinates with MAGERT is asking for submissions
• Herman Moll was a physician, not a cartographer
• Cadwallader Colden was called the Father of the Erie Canal because he got it correctly on a map
• The British government didn’t pay Colden, so he didn’t make maps for them
• Lewis Evans didn’t want to rely on latitude, only on distance measurements made by chains. Didn’t use projections, either.
• David Allen used Map Analyst (free and easy to use) to measure accuracy of the maps by matching locations on modern and historic maps—the program shows you how maps differ. It’s not the same as georeferencing because it doesn’t distort and stretch the maps.
• John Montresor’s map was more accurate than Evans’ map.
• Samuel Holland’s map was more accurate than Montressor’s map. He used some sort of projection when creating his map.
I don't know whether this comment is intended as a summary or a critique of my views, but it does not do a good job of representing what I said. I deal with the points raised here in an article that is partially based on my talk. It can be found at the Web site of the New York Map Society at:
http://www.nymapsociety.org/FEATURES/INDEX.HTM
David Allen
Post a Comment